Species group: fuliginosus
These are the dichotomous keys to identify species of Dermestes (Coleoptera; Dermestidae) on a worldwide scale.
Click on the species names to go to their taxon page. Click here to go back to the subgenus page. Click here to go back to the main page.
1a. Pronotum and head are entirely covered with dense golden brown pubescence.
→ Dermestes hirticollis
1b. Pronotum black in colour. Go to question: 2
2a. Pronotum is 1.6 times as wide as long. Go to question: 3
2b. Pronotum is less than 1.5 times as wide as long. Go to question: 4
3a. Hairs on pronotum black on the disc and yellow laterally, scutellum with long and yellow pubescence; two lateral depressions on the first sternite.
→ Dermestes sichuanicus
3b. Hairs on both pronotum and scutellum short and black; one lateral depression on the first sternite.
→ Dermestes roubali *
4a. The abdomen are covered in yellow or yellowish-grey hairs; flattened body; posterior margin of the pronotum bilobed with yellow hairs. Go to question: 5
4b. The majority of the abdominal sternites are covered in black hairs; posterior margin of the pronotum not lobed. Go to question: 6
5a. Aabdomen fully covered in yellow hairs; punctuation on pronotum and elytra is very thinly.
→ Dermestes depressus
5b. All margins of the ventral segments are fringed with golden-yellow hairs; punctuation on pronotum is finely and densely, but more sparsely and therefore shiny on the disc, punctuation on the elytra are densely and rather coarsly.
→ Dermestes latissimus
6a. The last abdominal sternite is covered in black hairs; antennal club is black; 7-8 mm long.
→ Dermestes fuliginosus
6b. The last abdominal sternite is covered with reddish hairs; antennal club is brown; 6-7 mm long.
→ Dermestes olivieri
* In both the orginal species description as the species redescription of Dermestes roubali, the large width of the pronotum compared to its length is noted (Kalík 1951, Lozinskaya & Legalov 1999). The ratio of the pronotum being 1.6 times wide as long is als mentioned as a key feature compared to other species (ratio of 1.5 or smaller) in other sources (Zhantiev 1976, Háva 1999). However, the beetles identified as D. roubali in the collection of A. Herrmann are in conflict with the existing literature. The beetles in question were collected in east Kazachstan and the following was said by Herrmann (pers. comm.) about the female specimen whose dorsal image is shown in his picture gallery: "I measured the pronotum of D. roubali in the photo precisely from above and found it to be 2.6 x 3.8 mm, which corresponds to a ratio of 1.46."
Two options are possible as for why the pronotum's width/length ratio does not reach the treshold set for the species:
1. The species is more variable in size of the pronotum as previously thought and described.
2. The collected beetles are a new undescribed species that is being confused with D. roubali.
Comparison of the drawn antenna and lateral margin of D.roubali from existing literature and photos made by A. Herrmann of the beetle(s) in his holdings identified as D.roubali:
Made by Sarah Mahie
Created on: 30-12-2025
Latest update: 07-01-2026